From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Macomber

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 19, 2021
2:15-cv-0248 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)

Opinion

2:15-cv-0248 TLN AC P

07-19-2021

TIMOTHY RAY BAKER, Plaintiff, v. J. MACOMBER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a motion for a settlement conference. ECF No. 169. After resolution of defendant's motion for summary judgment, this case was scheduled for a mandatory settlement conference, ECF No. 91, which was unsuccessful, ECF No. 96. Defendant was therefore directed to notify the court of his position on the utility of another settlement conference. ECF No. 170. Defendant has now responded that he does not believe a further settlement conference would be fruitful at this time. ECF No. 171.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for a settlement conference, ECF No. 169, is DENIED.


Summaries of

Baker v. Macomber

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 19, 2021
2:15-cv-0248 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Baker v. Macomber

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY RAY BAKER, Plaintiff, v. J. MACOMBER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 19, 2021

Citations

2:15-cv-0248 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)