From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 3, 2011
No. 2:07-cv-1170 JAM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:07-cv-1170 JAM JFM (HC).

January 3, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has timely filed a notice of appeal of this court's September 24, 2010 denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus together with a motion for a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The court must either issue a certificate of appealability indicating which issues satisfy the required showing or must state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's August 3, 2010 findings and recommendations, petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's October 22, 2010 motion for a certificate of appealability is denied; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to process petitioner's appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

DATED: 12/30/2010


Summaries of

Baker v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 3, 2011
No. 2:07-cv-1170 JAM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Baker v. Kramer

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT GUY BAKER, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW C. KRAMER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 3, 2011

Citations

No. 2:07-cv-1170 JAM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2011)