Baker v. Interfor U.S. Inc.

Full title: ANTHONY BAKER, TIMOTHY COOPER & STEVEN CHARLTON, Plaintiffs, v. INTERFOR…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jul 25, 2017

Case No. 1:16 CV 01415-CL (D. Or. Jul. 25, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16 CV 01415-CL

07-25-2017

ANTHONY BAKER, TIMOTHY COOPER & STEVEN CHARLTON, Plaintiffs, v. INTERFOR U.S. INC., dba INTERFOR PACIFIC INC., Defendant.

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Clarke filed his Findings and Recommendation on June 15, 2017. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation,

Dated this 25^th day of July, 2017.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge