From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Baker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 20, 1982
419 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AL-354.

September 20, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Holmes County, W.L. Bailey, J.

Owen N. Powell, Bonifay, for appellant.

Clinton E. Foster and Richard D. Ogburn, Panama City, for appellee.


Appellant husband appeals the denial of his motion to vacate the final judgment of dissolution of marriage, in which the trial judge awarded to appellee wife a percentage of appellant's veteran's disability and social security benefits as permanent periodic alimony. We affirm.

In Higgins v. Higgins, 408 So.2d 731 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), and Cullen v. Cullen, 413 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), this Court has ruled that federal law does not preclude a Florida court from awarding permanent periodic alimony based on a percentage of military retirement pensions. For purposes of the question presented, we find no material distinction between military retirement pay and veteran's disability compensation benefits or social security benefits. Therefore, we conclude that the instant case is governed by the reasoning and rulings of the Higgins and Cullen decisions. Compare Miller v. Miller, 96 N.M. 497, 632 P.2d 732 (1981), in which the Supreme Court of New Mexico concluded that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding alimony where the sole sources of payment were disability compensation benefits payable by the Veteran's Administration and Social Security.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Baker v. Baker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 20, 1982
419 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Baker v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE BAKER, APPELLANT, v. BLONDELL F. BAKER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 20, 1982

Citations

419 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Winewica v. Winewica

By this appeal, among other things, the appellant attacks the inadequate alimony award given in a final…

Pilny v. Pilny

Since the husband is the legal owner of this benefit we presume that only he has access to this information.…