From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Advanced Imaging of Port Charlotte, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jun 11, 2018
Case No: 2:17-cv-403-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 11, 2018)

Opinion

Case No: 2:17-cv-403-FtM-38MRM

06-11-2018

JEFFREY BAKER, an individual Plaintiff, v. ADVANCED IMAGING OF PORT CHARLOTTE, LLC, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. --------

This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 25). Judge McCoy recommends the Clerk of Court be directed to enter a Clerk's Default against Defendant Advanced Imaging of Port Charlotte, LLC because of the company's repeated failures to hire counsel. (Doc. 25). Advanced Imaging has not objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. The Report and Recommendation is thus ripe for review.

A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Id. And "[t]he judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." Id.

After examining the file independently, and upon considering Judge McCoy's findings and recommendations, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein.

(2) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter a Clerk's Default against Defendant Advanced Imaging of Port Charlotte, LLC.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 11 th day of June 2018.

/s/ _________

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies: All Parties of Record


Summaries of

Baker v. Advanced Imaging of Port Charlotte, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jun 11, 2018
Case No: 2:17-cv-403-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Baker v. Advanced Imaging of Port Charlotte, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY BAKER, an individual Plaintiff, v. ADVANCED IMAGING OF PORT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 11, 2018

Citations

Case No: 2:17-cv-403-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 11, 2018)