From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BAK v. GOLDEN TOUCH MANAGEMENT, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 2003
303 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-03622, 2002-03623, 2002-09007

Submitted January 22, 2003.

March 3, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, Edward H. Suh and Associates, P.C., the outgoing law firm, appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated November 29, 2001, (2) an order of the same court dated January 22, 2002, which, upon its failure to submit opposition papers, granted the motion of Sackstein, Sackstein, Sackstein Lee, LLP, the incoming law firm, to apportion attorneys' fees to the extent of awarding the latter 90% of the total fee and awarding it only 10% of the total, and (3) an order of the same court, dated February 1, 2002, which denied its motion, in effect, to vacate the order dated January 22, 2002.

Edward H. Suh and Associates, P.C., Flushing, N.Y., nonparty-appellant pro se.

Sackstein, Sackstein, Sackstein Lee, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Laurence D. Rogers of counsel), nonparty-respondent pro se.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from the decision dated November 29, 2001, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. Green Constr. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 509); and is further,

ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated January 22, 2002, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511; Forma v. City of New York, 273 A.D.2d 271), and it is further,

ORDERED that the order dated February 1, 2002, is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to Sackstein, Sackstein, Sackstein Lee, LLP.

In order to establish entitlement to vacatur of its default in opposing the motion of Sackstein, Sackstein, Sackstein Lee, LLP, the appellant was required to show a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious claim (see CPLR 5015[a]; Miles v. Blue Label Trucking, 232 A.D.2d 382). The appellant failed to satisfy this standard.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

BAK v. GOLDEN TOUCH MANAGEMENT, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 2003
303 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

BAK v. GOLDEN TOUCH MANAGEMENT, INC

Case Details

Full title:CHAE GUN BAK, plaintiff, v. GOLDEN TOUCH MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 3, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 653