From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baisley v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1970
35 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

November 30, 1970


In a negligence action to recover for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated March 14, 1969, in favor of defendant upon the trial court's granting of a motion to dismiss the complaint at the close of plaintiff's case. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The questions of fact have not been considered. The injuries were claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff when he fell on the floor of defendant's premises while he was a guest at a wedding reception. In our view, his evidence, if believed by a jury, would permit a finding that an excessive quantity of an unknown substance was spread on the floor shortly before plaintiff's fall and that this created a dangerous condition ( Gough v. Wadhans Mill Grange No. 1015, 279 App. Div. 825). Thus, plaintiff was entitled to a determination by a jury verdict. Christ, P.J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Baisley v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1970
35 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Baisley v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:FRANK BAISLEY, Appellant, v. NELSON ROSE, Doing Business as COME INN TO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1970

Citations

35 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Swartz v. Rose

Hopkins, Acting P.J., Munder and Brennan, JJ., concur; Gulotta, J., dissents and votes to affirm, with the…

Rhodes v. Towers

Thus, the court properly concluded that an issue of fact was raised as to whether the floor was excessively…