From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baisden v. State

Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District
Oct 24, 2023
676 S.W.3d 525 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

No. ED 111306

10-24-2023

Quincy BAISDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Lauren McGrady, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101. FOR RESPONDENT: Andrew Bailey, Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.


FOR APPELLANT: Lauren McGrady, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Andrew Bailey, Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Thomas C. Clark, II, C.J., James M. Dowd, J., and John P. Torbitzky, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant Quincy Baisden appeals the motion court's judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Baisden v. State

Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District
Oct 24, 2023
676 S.W.3d 525 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

Baisden v. State

Case Details

Full title:QUINCY BAISDEN, APP v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Court:Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District

Date published: Oct 24, 2023

Citations

676 S.W.3d 525 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)