From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baird v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 17, 1970
455 S.W.2d 259 (Tex. Crim. App. 1970)

Opinion

No. 42955.

June 17, 1970.

Appeal from the 91st Judicial District Court, Eastland County, Earl Conner, Jr.

Nathan O. Newman, II, Abilene, for appellant.

Emory C. Walton, Dist. Atty., Eastland, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


The offense is escape from jail by the use of a firearm; the punishment, 12 years.

The sole question presented is the power of the trial court to cumulate the sentence in this cause with the sentence in a prior conviction rendered against this appellant in the same court. It is appellant's contention, not supported by authority, that this constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Though persuasive, appellant's argument runs in the face of the statute authorizing cumulation of sentences and cannot be sustained.

Article 42.08, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.

Other than the above, appellant's counsel admits that there are no further grounds of error that can be urged. We have examined the record with care and agree with counsel that there are no other errors which he could raise.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Baird v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 17, 1970
455 S.W.2d 259 (Tex. Crim. App. 1970)
Case details for

Baird v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jerry Wayne BAIRD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 17, 1970

Citations

455 S.W.2d 259 (Tex. Crim. App. 1970)

Citing Cases

Williamson v. State

We first recognize that there is authority stating that the cumulation of sentences does not constitute cruel…

Williams v. State

Moreover, even had Williams preserved error, a punishment falling within the limits prescribed by a valid…