From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baird v. Reese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 22, 1941
261 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

January 22, 1941.

Appeal from Supreme Court.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.


The action is to recover damages for alleged false and fraudulent representations. The facts involved in this action were all litigated and decided in Fulton County National Bank Trust Co. of Gloversville v. Reese ( 249 App. Div. 702). On the present appeal plaintiff makes no claim that the evidence does not sustain the judgment. His sole criticism is that while testifying as a witness the trial judge should have granted him a recess in order that he might consult with his counsel and frame his answers accordingly. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Baird v. Reese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 22, 1941
261 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Baird v. Reese

Case Details

Full title:HOMER BAIRD, Appellant, v. HARVEY E. REESE and LILLIAN M. REESE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 22, 1941

Citations

261 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)