From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baird v. Farmer Bros. Northwest, Inc.

Supreme Court of Utah
Jun 28, 1963
382 P.2d 883 (Utah 1963)

Opinion

No. 9814.

June 28, 1963.

Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County, A.H. Ellett, J.

Rawlings, Wallace, Roberts Black, Richard C. Dibblee, Salt Lake City, for appellants.

Skeen, Worsley, Snow Christensen, Salt Lake City, for respondent.


Appeal from a dismissal. Affirmed, with costs to defendant.

H, an employee of defendant was hired to work Monday through Friday selling coffee and accessories with a truck furnished him. On a Friday a customer called and H happened to answer the phone. He took the order. On Saturday, accompanied by his roommate, whom he took specifically to see the country, he delivered the coffee in his own passenger car, not the company truck. Returning home, but sleepy, he let his friend drive and an accident ensued, the subject of this case.

Plaintiff says defendant was negligent on some theory of respondeat superior. The evidence clearly showed no authority for H's action, and that what he did was in violation of his employer's specific instructions.

The trial court found no responsible vicariousness, and we agree.

McDONOUGH, CALLISTER, CROCKETT, and WADE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Baird v. Farmer Bros. Northwest, Inc.

Supreme Court of Utah
Jun 28, 1963
382 P.2d 883 (Utah 1963)
Case details for

Baird v. Farmer Bros. Northwest, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD W. BAIRD ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, v. FARMER BROS…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Jun 28, 1963

Citations

382 P.2d 883 (Utah 1963)
14 Utah 2

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Chumney

2. "Under the doctrine of res judicata, whenever there has been a judgment by a court of competent…

Willis v. Century Finance Company, Inc.

In any event, since the motion to set aside fails to show any special reason why its ground of attack could…