From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baird v. Burlington

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 10, 2007
221 F. App'x 475 (8th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-1281.

Submitted: April 6, 2007.

Filed: April 10, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Daniel R. Baird, Dilworth, MN, pro se.

Diane Patricia Gerth, Rodney A. Honkanen, Spence Ricke, St. Paul, MN, David M. Pryor, Chaya Bail, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Fort Worth, TX, for Appellee.

Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Daniel R. Baird appeals from the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his action for relocation benefits from his employer. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we agree that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See K.C.1986 Ltd. P'ship v. Reade Mfg., 472 F.3d 1009, 1019-20 (8th Cir. 2007) (de novo review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Baird's pending motions.

The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.


Summaries of

Baird v. Burlington

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Apr 10, 2007
221 F. App'x 475 (8th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Baird v. Burlington

Case Details

Full title:Daniel R. BAIRD, Appellant, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Apr 10, 2007

Citations

221 F. App'x 475 (8th Cir. 2007)