From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baiocco v. Charles H. Greenthal Management

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 1995
220 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 24, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.).


There is no merit to plaintiff's contention that defendants' failure to initiate holdover proceedings or demand rent during plaintiff's holdover period should estop them from seeking payment for use and occupancy ( see, 1400 Broadway Assocs. v. Lee Co., 161 Misc.2d 497, 500). Plaintiff's remaining contentions are also without merit or improperly raised for the first time on appeal ( Aguirre v. City of New York, 214 A.D.2d 692, 694).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Ross, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Baiocco v. Charles H. Greenthal Management

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 1995
220 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Baiocco v. Charles H. Greenthal Management

Case Details

Full title:COSTANZA BAIOCCO, Appellant, v. CHARLES H. GREENTHAL MANAGEMENT et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 24, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 10

Citing Cases

Goldman v. Rosen

Accordingly, petitioner is entitled only to four-percent of the total use and occupancy owed. Petitioner is…