From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baine v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 6, 2001
44 S.W.3d 401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED78362

FILED: March 6, 2001

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Perry County Honorable John W. Grimm.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.



ORDER


Movant, Tyler Baine, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have previously affirmed Movant's conviction for conspiracy to commit first degree robbery in violation of section 564.014, RSMo 1994. State v. Baine, 3 S.W.3d 860 (Mo.App.E.D. 1999).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Baine v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 6, 2001
44 S.W.3d 401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Baine v. State

Case Details

Full title:TYLER BAINE, Appellant, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Mar 6, 2001

Citations

44 S.W.3d 401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)