From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BAINBRIDGE v. HOES

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1914
163 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

April, 1914.


Judgment affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of William Allaire Shortt, referee. It may be that the plaintiff has some remedy against the administrator upon contract. Jenks, P.J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

BAINBRIDGE v. HOES

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1914
163 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

BAINBRIDGE v. HOES

Case Details

Full title:Philip M. Bainbridge, Appellant, v. William M. Hoes, Public Administrator…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1914

Citations

163 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Citing Cases

Standard Factors Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust

" A check in the usual form, unless accepted or certified by the bank on which it is drawn, does not operate…

Sekelsky v. Sekelsky

When the means of the impending demise is suicide, the law is emphatic. "It would be against public policy to…