From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 15, 2002
830 So. 2d 894 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 2D02-2516.

Opinion filed November 15, 2002.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Jack Espinosa, Jr., Judge.


John Bain challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. In his motion, Bain alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him that these convictions could not be used in the future as prior offenses for sentencing purposes. InStansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel.

Affirmed.

GREEN and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.

THEREOF IF FILED.


Summaries of

Bain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 15, 2002
830 So. 2d 894 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Bain v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN LEE BAIN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 15, 2002

Citations

830 So. 2d 894 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)