From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bain v. Office of Pers. Mgmt.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 10, 2017
2016-1333 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1333

02-10-2017

BRITNEY L. BAIN, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent

MICHAEL BRADY, Law Office of Michael T. Brady, Winthrop, WA, argued for petitioner. SHARI A. ROSE, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ALLISON KIDD-MILLER.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-0845-15-0579-I-1.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL BRADY, Law Office of Michael T. Brady, Winthrop, WA, argued for petitioner. SHARI A. ROSE, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ALLISON KIDD-MILLER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 10, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Bain v. Office of Pers. Mgmt.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 10, 2017
2016-1333 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2017)
Case details for

Bain v. Office of Pers. Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:BRITNEY L. BAIN, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 10, 2017

Citations

2016-1333 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2017)