Bain v. Gartrell

3 Citing cases

  1. Knight v. Hired Hand Green, Inc.

    775 So. 2d 218 (Ala. Civ. App. 1999)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that the plaintiff "was necessarily entitled to . . . an attorney fee for collection of that balance, pursuant to the clear terms of the contract"

    "Bain v. Gartrell, 666 So.2d 523, 524 (Ala.Civ.App. 1995) (citations omitted). The court made no specific findings with regard to whether the term "completion," as it appeared in the contract, was ambiguous.

  2. Holmes v. Holmes

    17 So. 3d 666 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009)   Cited 2 times

    An agreement is ambiguous if it is susceptible to more than one meaning. Bain v. Gartrell, 666 So.2d 523 (Ala.Civ.App. 1995). However, an agreement is not rendered ambiguous simply because the parties assign different meanings to it.

  3. Cain v. Saunders

    813 So. 2d 891 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001)   Cited 3 times

    An agreement is ambiguous if it is susceptible to more than one meaning. Bain v. Gartrell, 666 So.2d 523 (Ala.Civ.App. 1995). However, an agreement is not rendered ambiguous simply because the parties assign different meanings to it.