From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Worthington Cylinder Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 20, 2019
Case No. 16 CV 07548 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 20, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 16 CV 07548

11-20-2019

Kurtis M. Bailey, Plaintiff, v. Worthington Cylinder Corporation, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Based on the reasons below, Attorney Shalaby is barred from filing any document in this case unless and until a sanctions motion is filed against him after the adjudication of plaintiff's claims on the merits and the court enters an order granting him leave to file.

STATEMENT

On October 17, 2019, Magistrate Judge Jensen entered an order [503] striking Attorney Shalaby's motion [501] to strike with prejudice the motions for sanctions filed by Thomas Eager [425] and Worthington Cylinder Corporation and Worthington Industries, Inc. [435] which the court previously ordered [439] stricken without prejudice on March 12, 2019. Magistrate Judge Jensen's order gave Attorney Shalaby leave to refile his motion following the court's ruling on plaintiff's motion [489] to retransfer this case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The transfer motion has now been denied.

The court's prior order [439] striking the sanctions motion stated: "No motion seeking sanctions against Attorney Shalaby shall be filed in this case until after plaintiff's claims in this case have been adjudicated on the merits." The purpose of this order was to focus all subsequent filings and proceedings in this case on resolving plaintiff's claims. In furtherance of achieving this purpose, unless and until a motion for sanctions against Attorney Shalaby is filed after plaintiff's claims have been adjudicated on the merits Attorney Shalaby shall not file any document in this case. This prohibition includes not refiling the motion [501] to strike the Eagar and Worthington defendants' motions with prejudice. As Attorney Shalaby is no longer counsel of record in this case he is no longer authorized to file documents in this case. See [405]. After Dr. Eager filed his motion for sanctions, Magistrate Judge Johnston entered an order [428] allowing Attorney Shalaby to file a response to Dr. Eager's sanctions motion. Dr. Eagar's motion was stricken [439] eliminating the need for any response from Attorney Shalaby and the court's March 12, 2019 order [439] bars any other sanctions motions until plaintiff's claims are adjudicated on the merits.

Based on the foregoing, Attorney Shalaby is barred from filing any document in this case unless and until a sanctions motion is filed against him after the adjudication of plaintiff's claims on the merits and the court enters an order granting him leave to file. Date: 11/20/2019

ENTER:

/s/_________

United States District Court Judge

Electronic Notices. (LC)


Summaries of

Bailey v. Worthington Cylinder Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 20, 2019
Case No. 16 CV 07548 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Bailey v. Worthington Cylinder Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Kurtis M. Bailey, Plaintiff, v. Worthington Cylinder Corporation, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 20, 2019

Citations

Case No. 16 CV 07548 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 20, 2019)