From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 9, 2022
2:19-cv-01725-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-01725-GMN-BNW

12-09-2022

ANTHONY BAILEY, Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

GLORIA M. NAVARRO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This is a federal habeas corpus proceeding filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner Anthony Bailey filed a request for judicial notice attaching documents that do not comply with the redaction requirements of LR IC 6-1(a)(1) and (3). See ECF No. 97 at 5. Compelling reasons exist to seal that document as it contains personal-data identifiers, and the parties cannot change their filings.

LR IC 6-1(a)(1) states “[i]f an individual's social security number must be included, only the last four digits of that number should be used.” LR IC 6-1(a)(3) states “[i]f an individual's date of birth must be included, only the year should be used.” According to LR IC 7-1, “[T]he court may strike documents that do not comply with these rules.”

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

1. Within 10 days after entry of this order, Petitioner must file a redacted publicly available copy of ECF No. 97 that complies with LR IC 6-1(a)(1)-(5).

2. The Clerk of the Court shall seal the document filed as ECF No. 97.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 9, 2022
2:19-cv-01725-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Bailey v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BAILEY, Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 9, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-01725-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 9, 2022)