From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. The Pot Shop Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 22, 2024
5:24-cv-01456-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-01456-SSS-DTBx

11-22-2024

Marquise Bailey v. The Pot Shop, Inc., et al.


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES- GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DOE DEFENDANTS

On July 12, 2024, Plaintiff Marquise Bailey filed a Complaint in which numerous Doe defendants are listed. [See Dkt. 1]. As of the date of this order, there is no evidence in the record to show Plaintiff has timely served these defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Doe defendants should not be dismissed for failure to name and serve a copy of the summons and Complaint on these defendants. Plaintiff must respond in writing by December 2, 2024. Failure to respond will result in a dismissal of the Doe Defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to obey court orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bailey v. The Pot Shop Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 22, 2024
5:24-cv-01456-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Bailey v. The Pot Shop Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Marquise Bailey v. The Pot Shop, Inc., et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 22, 2024

Citations

5:24-cv-01456-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2024)