From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 29, 2022
No. 04-22-00327-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 29, 2022)

Opinion

04-22-00327-CR

07-29-2022

Brent Eugene BAILEY, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Brent Eugene Bailey Joe D. Gonzales Bexar County District Attorney Dean Diachin Bexar County Public Defender's Office


From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR11769 Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

Brent Eugene Bailey

Joe D. Gonzales Bexar County District Attorney

Dean Diachin Bexar County Public Defender's Office

REBECA C. MARTINEZ CHIEF JUSTICE PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA IRENE RIOS BETH WATKINS LIZA A. RODRIGUEZ LORI I. VALENZUELA JUSTICES

ORDER

PER CURAIM

Enclosed please find the order which the Honorable Court of Appeals has issued in reference to the above styled and numbered cause.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

On July 20, 2022, this court issued an opinion dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction based on appellant's untimely notice of appeal. On July 25, 2022, appellant filed a pro se "Motion for Discretionary Review," which we construe as a motion for rehearing. In his motion, appellant raises three complains: (1) he was not shown all the contents of his file and, if he had been, then he would have gone to trial and not taken a plea agreement; (2) after reviewing his file in January 2022, he discovered more errors, mistakes, and false statements by officers that would have supported his appeal; and (3) without full disclosure of the evidence, his plea agreement should be void. Appellant does not challenge the untimeliness of his notice of appeal.

We DENY appellant's Motion for Discretionary Review.

Should appellant wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of our July 20, 2022 opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals, see id. R. 68.3, and any such petition must comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bailey v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 29, 2022
No. 04-22-00327-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Bailey v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brent Eugene BAILEY, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Jul 29, 2022

Citations

No. 04-22-00327-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 29, 2022)