From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 18, 1972
267 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 70-314.

April 18, 1972.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Vaughn J. Rudnick, Judge.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Andrew I. Friedrich, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We have examined the record and briefs filed in this appeal. We feel the requirements of the Frank v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 199 So.2d 117, Markman v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 210 So.2d 486 and Arant v. State, First District Court of Appeal, 256 So.2d 515, opinion filed January 18, 1972, cases have been met here. There was ample evidence submitted to the jury that defendant had sufficient knowledge of and control over the drugs to constitute possession. We, therefore, affirm.

Affirmed.

REED, C.J., and WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bailey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 18, 1972
267 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Bailey v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DOC BAILEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 18, 1972

Citations

267 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)