From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 20, 2018
245 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 1D18–1466

06-20-2018

Branden J. BAILEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Branden J. Bailey, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Branden J. Bailey, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Landmark at Crescent Ridge LP v. Everest Fin., Inc., 219 So.3d 218, 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (explaining that where the threshold requirement of irreparable harm is not established, the petition for writ of certiorari must be dismissed).

Wolf, Jay, and Winsor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bailey v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 20, 2018
245 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Bailey v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRANDEN J. BAILEY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jun 20, 2018

Citations

245 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)