From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

May, 1936.

Present — Hill, P.J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


The plaintiff in her car going easterly on Market street in the city of Elmira was in collision with the defendant who had just come into Market street from Fox street to the south. The evidence presented an issue of fact as to which party was negligent. There were no legal errors that would require a reversal of the judgment in favor of the defendants. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Bailey v. Russo

Case Details

Full title:JENNIE BAILEY, Appellant, v. VINCENT RUSSO and ROSE RUSSO, Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)