From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Roche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1898
32 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Opinion

July Term, 1898.


Judgment affirmed, with costs.


The plaintiffs and David Roche made a contract whereby the plaintiffs were to furnish Roche certain building materials for a house which the latter was erecting at Far Rockaway The complaint alleged that the plaintiffs furnished materials amounting to $4,963.38, and that Roche paid on account $4,203.94, leaving unpaid $759.44. The answer denied that the value of the goods exceeded the amount paid, and by way of set-off alleged that by the agreement between the parties the material was to be of "first quality," but was not all of such character, to the defendant's damage $958.44, the amount unpaid. The issues were referred, and the defendant Roche dying, the present defendant, executor of his will, was substituted as defendant. A large amount of evidence was taken, some of it tending to prove that the materials furnished were of first quality, and some of it tending to show that a part of them was of inferior quality, but there was only a simple question of fact involved. After careful examination of the evidence we see no reason to disturb the finding of the referee, who made a slight allowance for defects and found that the plaintiffs had substantially complied with their contract and furnished materials to the value of $4,909.09, and directed a judgment on that basis. All concurred, except Woodward, J., absent.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Roche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1898
32 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Case details for

Bailey v. Roche

Case Details

Full title:Edwin Bailey and Others, Respondents, v. Edward Roche, as Executor of the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1898

Citations

32 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)