From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Omar

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 16, 2021
LA CV20-00875 JAK (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2021)

Opinion

LA CV20-00875 JAK (AFMx)

06-16-2021

Mister Bailey v. Yehia Saleh Omar, et al.


Present: The Honorable JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK

OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than June 23, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution regarding overdue responses, as to defendant John Gillespie and The Vessel Windwalker. Pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff shall file an application requesting the entry of default. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of an application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No. oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to respond will result in the dismissal of this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Omar

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 16, 2021
LA CV20-00875 JAK (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Bailey v. Omar

Case Details

Full title:Mister Bailey v. Yehia Saleh Omar, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 16, 2021

Citations

LA CV20-00875 JAK (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2021)