From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. OG Cent. Cannabis Dispensary

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 5, 2024
CV 24-8785 PA (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-8785 PA (PVCx)

12-05-2024

Mister Bailey v. OG Central Cannabis Dispensary et al


Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before December 12, 2024, why Defendant Alberto Del Real should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bailey v. OG Cent. Cannabis Dispensary

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 5, 2024
CV 24-8785 PA (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Bailey v. OG Cent. Cannabis Dispensary

Case Details

Full title:Mister Bailey v. OG Central Cannabis Dispensary et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 5, 2024

Citations

CV 24-8785 PA (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2024)