From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. New York City Health and Hospitals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 1993
191 A.D.2d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 22, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's first two requests to reschedule an examination pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h were granted by the defendant; her third request was denied. Since the plaintiff took no action to reschedule the examination in the nearly two years and three months after the denial, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in dismissing the complaint pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h (see, Best v. City of New York, 97 A.D.2d 389, affd 61 N.Y.2d 847). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bailey v. New York City Health and Hospitals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 1993
191 A.D.2d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Bailey v. New York City Health and Hospitals

Case Details

Full title:DORIS BAILEY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 22, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 247

Citing Cases

Landa v. Poloncarz

Here, plaintiff adjourned the examination on two separate occasions and failed to respond to defendant's…

Adimola v. County of Suffolk

Accordingly, this is a question for the jury ( Houston v. City of New York, 256 A.D.2d 277, 682 N.Y.S.2d…