On appeal it is the duty of this court to construe the evidence more strongly in support of the verdict and judgment. See Bailey v. Lurlee, Inc., 131 Ga. App. 546 ( 206 S.E.2d 529). Further, if there is any evidence to support the jury's verdict and the court's judgment, that judgment will not be disturbed on appeal. See Scott v. Scott, 243 Ga. 472, 473 ( 254 S.E.2d 852); Williams v. Murray, 239 Ga. 276 ( 236 S.E.2d 624). While, admittedly, the verdict of the jury (the judgment following same) was somewhat confusing in that there was a monetary award to both the plaintiff ($8,746.37) and to the defendants ($1,500), both arising out of the same contract with reference to the work performed; nevertheless, defendants have failed to point out wherein said verdict and judgment was in error.

The rule is that this court cannot review the findings of juries, or judges, on issues of fact, unless, as a matter of law, a verdict has no evidence to support it. [Cits.]" Bailey v. Lurlee, Inc., 131 Ga. App. 546 ( 206 S.E.2d 529) (1974). In the case before us, there is evidence, although in dispute, which authorized the amount of the jury's verdict.

The record contains ample evidence supporting all of the trial court's findings. See Bailey v. Lurlee, Inc., 131 Ga. App. 546 ( 206 S.E.2d 529). 4. Appellants further contend that the November 29, 1978, meeting of Peyton Village Townhouse owners (at which meeting the Board of Directors was elected) was illegally called by Atlanta Federal.

As there was no evidence to support the jury verdict, it was an unlawful verdict and must be reversed. Bailey v. Lurlee, Inc., 131 Ga. App. 546 ( 206 S.E.2d 529) (1974); J. R. Watkins Co. v. Strickland, 93 Ga. App. 859 ( 93 S.E.2d 171) (1956). 2.

In considering the evidence this appellate court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the trial court where there is evidence to support the judgment. See Stricklin Co. v. Crawley, 1 Ga. App. 139 (2) ( 58 S.E. 215); Bailey v. Lurlee, Inc., 131 Ga. App. 546, 547 ( 206 S.E.2d 529); Lester Colodny Const. Co. v. Allen, 129 Ga. App. 545 ( 199 S.E.2d 917); Wilkins v. Wilkins, 234 Ga. 404, 405 ( 216 S.E.2d 302). The trial court did not err in making its determination that the lessee could in good faith cancel the lease agreement in that the property is not now usable for the fast food service intended by the contract.