From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. CIV S-10-0084 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0084 JAM CKD P

01-05-2012

DORIAN D. BAILEY, Petitioner, v. GREG LEWIS, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner was appointed counsel on April 5, 2010. As counsel has been appointed to represent petitioner, the court will not consider pro se documents about the presentation of his case. Local Rule 191(c).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's letter to the court (Docket No. 43) is disregarded.

____________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Bailey v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. CIV S-10-0084 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Bailey v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:DORIAN D. BAILEY, Petitioner, v. GREG LEWIS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0084 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)