Opinion
SC21-1156
09-30-2021
JOHN BAILEY Petitioner(s) v. MARK S. INCH, ETC. Respondent(s)
Lower Tribunal No(s).: 2D21-2233; 521991CF019920XXXXNO
To the extent the petitioner claims his sentences are illegal, the petition is hereby dismissed because this Court generally will not consider the repetitive petitions of persons who have abused the judicial processes of the lower courts such that they have been barred from filing certain actions there. See Pettway v. State, 776 So.2d 930, 931 (Fla. 2000). To the extent that the petitioner seeks additional relief, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby denied because petitioner raises the same issues as in Bailey v. Inch, 2021 WL 3362114 (Fla. Aug. 3, 2021), in which the petition was denied. Cf. Topps v. State, 865 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 2004). No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court.
POLSTON, LAWSON, MUNIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.