From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Inch

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 30, 2021
No. SC21-1156 (Fla. Sep. 30, 2021)

Opinion

SC21-1156

09-30-2021

JOHN BAILEY Petitioner(s) v. MARK S. INCH, ETC. Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 2D21-2233; 521991CF019920XXXXNO

To the extent the petitioner claims his sentences are illegal, the petition is hereby dismissed because this Court generally will not consider the repetitive petitions of persons who have abused the judicial processes of the lower courts such that they have been barred from filing certain actions there. See Pettway v. State, 776 So.2d 930, 931 (Fla. 2000). To the extent that the petitioner seeks additional relief, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby denied because petitioner raises the same issues as in Bailey v. Inch, 2021 WL 3362114 (Fla. Aug. 3, 2021), in which the petition was denied. Cf. Topps v. State, 865 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 2004). No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by this Court.

POLSTON, LAWSON, MUNIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Inch

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 30, 2021
No. SC21-1156 (Fla. Sep. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Bailey v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BAILEY Petitioner(s) v. MARK S. INCH, ETC. Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 30, 2021

Citations

No. SC21-1156 (Fla. Sep. 30, 2021)