From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Holinka

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 10, 2009
09-cv-360-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 10, 2009)

Opinion

09-cv-360-bbc.

June 10, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Oxford, Wisconsin, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He requests leave to proceedin forma pauperis and has supported his request with an affidavit of indigency and a copy of his trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his petition.

In determining whether a petitioner is indigent for the purpose of filing a § 2241 petition, this court calculates the average monthly deposits and the average monthly balances in the petitioner's prison account for the six-month period mentioned above. If 20% of the greater of these two figures is $5 or more, then the petitioner is not eligible for indigent status and must prepay all of the $5 filing fee. If 20% of the greater of these two figures is less than $5, the petitioner must prepay whatever portion of $5 the 20% calculation works out to be.

Petitioner's trust fund account statement reveals that he has deposits totaling $1,283.58 to his prison account over the last six-month period, for an average monthly deposit of $213.93. It is unnecessary to calculate petitioner's monthly balances for the same six month period, because regardless which amount is greater, he does not qualify for indigent status. Twenty percent of $213.93 is $42.79, which is more than the $5 filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this case is DENIED. Petitioner may have until July 2, 2009, in which to submit a check or money order made payable to the clerk of court in the amount of $5 to cover the fee for filing his petition. If, by July 2, 2009, petitioner fails to pay the fee or show cause why he is unable to do so, then the clerk of court is directed to close this file for petitioner's failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Holinka

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 10, 2009
09-cv-360-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Bailey v. Holinka

Case Details

Full title:JAMAR BAILEY, Petitioner, v. CAROL HOLINKA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 10, 2009

Citations

09-cv-360-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 10, 2009)