From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Golden State Foods Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 20, 2015
No. 4:14-CV-1631 RLW (E.D. Mo. Oct. 20, 2015)

Opinion

No. 4:14-CV-1631 RLW

10-20-2015

HEATHER BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN STATE FOODS CORP. and DAVID LAX, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on its review of the record. On October 9, 2015, Defendants filed a Motion for Protective Order Quashing Plaintiff's Notice of Videotaped Deposition Duces Tecum of Corporate Representative from Golden State Foods Corporation and Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 37). To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to this Motion.

Pursuant to E.D.Mo. L.R 4.01, a party opposing a motion must file a memorandum in opposition within seven (7) days after being served with the motion. --------

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' Motion for Protective Order Quashing Plaintiff's Notice of Videotaped Deposition Duces Tecum of Corporate Representative from Golden State Foods Corporation and Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 37) no later than October 26, 2015, or the Court will rule on Defendants' unopposed motion.

Dated this 20th day of October, 2015.

/s/ _________

RONNIE L. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bailey v. Golden State Foods Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 20, 2015
No. 4:14-CV-1631 RLW (E.D. Mo. Oct. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Bailey v. Golden State Foods Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HEATHER BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN STATE FOODS CORP. and DAVID LAX…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 20, 2015

Citations

No. 4:14-CV-1631 RLW (E.D. Mo. Oct. 20, 2015)