From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Flores

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 26, 2024
2:24-cv-05437-HDV-JC (C.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-05437-HDV-JC

12-26-2024

MISTER BAILEY v. JULIAN FLORES ET AL


Present: The Honorable Hernan D. Vera, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than January 2, 2025 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following on or before the above date as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause.

__ Proof of service of summons and complaint.
__ Response to complaint by the defendant or an application for entry of default - pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55(a).
X Application for entry of default judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil - Procedure 55(b).

No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Flores

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 26, 2024
2:24-cv-05437-HDV-JC (C.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Bailey v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:MISTER BAILEY v. JULIAN FLORES ET AL

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 26, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-05437-HDV-JC (C.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2024)