From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Cox

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 25, 2023
1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC)

04-25-2023

TIMOTHY BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. T. COX, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOOT (ECF NO. 31)

Plaintiff Timothy Bailey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint, filed April 24, 2023. Plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint to substitute Defendant J. Levya Mendez in place of Defendant L. Hernedez. (ECF No. 31.) Inasmuch as Defendant J. Levya Mendez was substituted in place of Defendant L. Hernedez on April 20, 2023 (ECF No. 30), at Plaintiff's request, his current motion to amend the complaint is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Cox

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 25, 2023
1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Bailey v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. T. COX, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 25, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2023)