From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. City of Henderson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 29, 2022
2:22-CV-01211-CDS-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-01211-CDS-EJY

08-29-2022

MICHAEL BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HENDERSON, NEVADA, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; THEDRICK ANDRES, individually and as policy maker and Chief of CITY OF HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; DOE individual as policy maker and Chief of CITY OF HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; HENDERSON POLICE OFFICERS DUSTIN ERICKSON; MARCUS MCCRARY; and LUKE GOOD; DOE HENDERSON POLICE OFFICERS I through X; CITY OF LAS VEGAS, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; SHERIFF JOE LOMBARDO, individually and as policy maker of LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; DOE LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS, I through X; DOES I through X; and ROE ENTITIES, I through X, inclusive, Defendants.

NICHOLAS G. VASKOV City Attorney BRIAN R. REEVE Assistant City Attorney BRANDON P. KEMBLE Assistant City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF HENDERSON, HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, THEDRICK ANDRES, DUSTIN ERICKSON, MARCUS McCRARY, and LUKE GOOD HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. TREVOR J. HATFIELD, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff MICHAEL BAILEY


NICHOLAS G. VASKOV

City Attorney

BRIAN R. REEVE

Assistant City Attorney

BRANDON P. KEMBLE

Assistant City Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF HENDERSON, HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, THEDRICK ANDRES, DUSTIN ERICKSON, MARCUS McCRARY, and LUKE GOOD

HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD.

TREVOR J. HATFIELD, ESQ.

Attorney for Plaintiff

MICHAEL BAILEY

STIPULATION AND ORDER

Plaintiff MICHAEL BAILEY (hereinafter “Plaintiff'), by and through his attorneys of record, Trevor J. Hatfield, Esq., of the Law Office of Hatfield and Associates, Ltd.; and CITY OF HENDERSON, HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, THEDRICK ANDRES, DUSTIN ERICKSON, MARCUS McCRARY, and LUKE GOOD (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Henderson Defendants'), through their attorney of record, Brian R. Reeve, Assistant City Attorney (all parties collectively referred to herein as the “Parties'), hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE:

1. That Plaintiff may serve process on all Henderson Defendants by emailing the Summons and Complaint to Brian R. Reeve, counsel for the Henderson Defendants;
2. That Plaintiff will grant the Henderson Defendants a 60-day extension of time from the date process is served to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint.

This stipulation is entered into in good faith, in the interest of judicial economy, and not for the purposes of delay. Each party agrees to bear its own fees and costs regarding this stipulation and order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bailey v. City of Henderson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 29, 2022
2:22-CV-01211-CDS-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Bailey v. City of Henderson

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HENDERSON, NEVADA, a political…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 29, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-01211-CDS-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 29, 2022)