From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Feb 12, 2018
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-80-DBH (D. Me. Feb. 12, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-80-DBH

02-12-2018

MICHAEL ALLAN BAILEY, PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 26, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on January 9, 2018. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

DATED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018

/S/D. BROCK HORNBY

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bailey v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Feb 12, 2018
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-80-DBH (D. Me. Feb. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Bailey v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ALLAN BAILEY, PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Feb 12, 2018

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-80-DBH (D. Me. Feb. 12, 2018)

Citing Cases

Viveiros v. Berryhill

ily activities helps to shed light on the veracity of the claimant's claims of pain and illuminate an RFC…