From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. AmTrust Fin. Servs.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 16, 2024
6:23-cv-797-CEM-EJK (M.D. Fla. Jul. 16, 2024)

Opinion

6:23-cv-797-CEM-EJK

07-16-2024

ANGELA BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

CARLOS E. MENDOZA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDIE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Amended Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Demand for Jury Trial (“Motion,” Doc. 38). The United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 51), recommending that the Motion be granted and that the Court strike Plaintiff's demand for a jury trial in her Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 33), (Doc. 51 at 8). Specifically, the Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff waived her right to a jury trial when she executed a valid and enforceable waiver and that “Plaintiff is unable to point to any evidence that the parties intended to cancel the [waiver].” (Id. at 7).

After review in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition is accepted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 51) is ADOPTED and made a part of this Order.
2. Defendant's Amended Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Demand for Jury Trial (Doc. 38) is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's demand for a jury trial is STRICKEN from her Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 33).

DONE AND ORDERED


Summaries of

Bailey v. AmTrust Fin. Servs.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 16, 2024
6:23-cv-797-CEM-EJK (M.D. Fla. Jul. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Bailey v. AmTrust Fin. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jul 16, 2024

Citations

6:23-cv-797-CEM-EJK (M.D. Fla. Jul. 16, 2024)