From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baia v. Baia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 3, 1987
129 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

April 3, 1987

Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, Killeen, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Boomer, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In 1985 Family Court modified a divorce decree entered in 1966 by directing respondent to pay petitioner support in the amount of $20 per week for a total of 52 weeks and providing that thereafter no alimony shall be paid. Petitioner appeals from that portion of the order which limits alimony to a definite period of 52 weeks. Under the circumstances here present, whether alimony should have been eliminated at a future date should not have been decided by Family Court (see, Tumolillo v Tumolillo, 71 A.D.2d 625, affd 51 N.Y.2d 790; Sterlace v Sterlace, 52 A.D.2d 743, 744; Matter of Stolls v Cabot, 45 A.D.2d 1014). The provision terminating petitioner's alimony after 52 weeks constitutes an in futuro modification not based on changed circumstances and must be deleted (see, McClusky v McClusky, 87 A.D.2d 973; see also, Scheinkman, Practice Commentary, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 14, Domestic Relations Law C236A:8, at 168-169). In all other respects, the order is affirmed.


Summaries of

Baia v. Baia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 3, 1987
129 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Baia v. Baia

Case Details

Full title:MARIE C. BAIA, Appellant, v. ALARICO BAIA, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1987

Citations

129 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Matter of Woller v. Woller

He did not affirmatively seek a complete termination of alimony. It was improper for the Family Court to have…