Opinion
Case No. 2:13-cv-01271-RFB-CWH
09-21-2015
AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR, Plaintiff, v. CLARK COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On October 2, 2013, the undersigned magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation that Plaintiff Afshin Bahrampour's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. (Report & Recommendation (ECF No. 7) at 3.) The undersigned magistrate judge further recommended that Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee of $400.00 within thirty days of the date that the district judge entered an order denying Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Id.) The report and recommendation stated that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed. (Id.) On June 13, 2014, the district judge entered an order adopting the report and recommendation in its entirety and denying Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Order (ECF No. 9).) More than thirty days have passed since the district judge's order, and Plaintiff has not paid the $400.00 filing fee.
RECOMMENDATION
IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff Afshin Bahrampour's case be dismissed, without prejudice.
NOTICE
This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to this case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party who objects to this Report and Recommendation may file a written objection supported by points and authorities within fourteen days of being served with this Report and Recommendation. Local Rule IB 3-2(a). Failure to file a timely objection may waive the right to appeal the District Court's Order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).
Dated: September 21, 2015
/s/_________
C.W.Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge