Opinion
February 20, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
It appears that the court intends to try the third-party action first, so as to determine the question of insurance coverage. Thus, we see no improvident exercise of the court's discretion in denying the motion to sever the third-party action ( see, CPLR 603; see also, Harris v. Manos, 181 A.D.2d 967). Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.