From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bahena v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 9, 2021
1:20-cv-01685-AWI-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01685-AWI-SAB (PC)

12-09-2021

ESMELING BAHENA, Plaintiff, v. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S STIPULATION FOR REFERRAL TO EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED (ECF NO. 29)

Esmeling Bahena (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983

On November 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed a stipulation for referral to early settlement conference. (ECF No. 29.) On December 8, 2021, Defendants filed a response to Plaintiff's stipulation. (ECF No. 32.)

Inasmuch as Defendants oppose Plaintiff's request for an early settlement conference based on the affirmative defense of failure to exhaust the administrative remedies, Plaintiff's stipulation to refer this case for early settlement conference shall be denied.

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff s stipulation to referral for early settlement conference is denied; and

2. Within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for improperly representing defense counsel's signature on the stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bahena v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 9, 2021
1:20-cv-01685-AWI-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Bahena v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:ESMELING BAHENA, Plaintiff, v. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 9, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-01685-AWI-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)