From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bahamonde v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued January 21, 2000

February 28, 2000

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, Steven B. Ferber, the attorney for the claimant, and Thomas J. Bailey, the attorney for the claimant in an unrelated claim to recover damages for personal injuries, separately appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated March 29, 1999, which, upon the motion of the claimant to vacate a judgment of the same court dated May 8, 1998, dismissing the claim, after a hearing, imposed a sanction of $6,000 against each of them.

Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. (Marshall D. Sweetbaum of counsel), for nonparty appellant Steven B. Ferber.

Rivkin, Radler Kremer, Uniondale, N.Y. (Evan H. Krinick and Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for nonparty appellant Thomas J. Bailey.

Eliot L. Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Peter H. Schiff and Michael S. Buskus of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements.

A court may impose a sanction against an attorney for frivolous conduct, including conduct which "is completely without merit in law and cannot be supported by a reasonable argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law" or "asserts material factual statements that are false" (22 NYCRR 130-1.1[a], [c][1], [3]). Here, however, the motion brought by the nonparty appellant Steven B. Ferber on behalf of the claimant was not so frivolous as to warrant the imposition of a sanction (see, Musumeci v. Musumeci, 267 A.D.2d 364 [2d Dept., Dec. 20, 1999]). The statement made by the nonparty appellant Thomas J. Bailey in his affirmation in support of the motion regarding the use of an aerial photograph at pretrial conferences, while inaccurate, was not material to the resolution of the motion to vacate the judgment. Accordingly, the nonparty appellants' conduct did not warrant the imposition of sanctions pursuant to 22 N.Y.CRR part 130.


Summaries of

Bahamonde v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Bahamonde v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. BAHAMONDE, claimant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, respondent; STEVEN B…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 117

Citing Cases

Tavella v. Tavella

There is similarly no evidence that appellant was motivated by anything other than a desire to secure the…

Matter of Gavilanes v. Dilan

The application was not without legal merit, was not brought in bad faith, and did not assert false material…