From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bahakel v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama
Aug 31, 1984
457 So. 2d 348 (Ala. 1984)

Summary

In Bahakel v. City of Birmingham, 457 So.2d 348 (Ala. 1984), we stated: "Rule 15 does not allow a party to amend his or her original complaint after an unsuccessful appeal, unless the mandate of the appellate court expressly permits such amendment."

Summary of this case from Ex Parte Ins. Co. of North America

Opinion

82-1051.

August 31, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Jefferson County, Thomas Huey, J.

Alfred Bahakel, Birmingham, for appellant.

Herbert Jenkins, Jr., Birmingham, for appellee.


This appeal involves an action for an unlawful arrest. Sahid Bahakel sued the City of Birmingham, Franklin Tate, and Marva Gibbs. Bahakel's original complaint, alleging malicious prosecution, was dismissed as to the city and Tate by the Jefferson Circuit Court. On February 18, 1983, this Court affirmed the dismissal as to the city and reversed and remanded as to dismissal of Tate. Bahakel v. City of Birmingham, 427 So.2d 143 (Ala. 1983).

On May 20, 1983, Bahakel filed an amended complaint, asserting wanton misconduct and negligence on the part of the city in failing to establish and follow adequate standards. The circuit court dismissed the amended complaint on June 22, 1983. Bahakel seeks review of the circuit court's dismissal of his amended complaint.

The issue presented here is whether an amendment of the complaint asserting additional grounds of recovery should be allowed where this Court has previously affirmed the dismissal of the complaint. This issue was previously before this Court in Hammond v. Realty Leasing, Inc., 351 So.2d 893 (Ala. 1977).

In Hammond, this Court wrote: "[A]mendments under Rule 15, Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, are to be freely allowed and Rule 15 must be liberally construed. However, Rule 15 does not allow a party to amend his or her original complaint after an unsuccessful appeal, unless the mandate of the appellate court expressly permits such amendment."

Our prior decision in this case, 427 So.2d 143, Bahakel did not provide for any further amendment of the original complaint. Therefore, on the authority of Hammond, the circuit court's dismissal of the amended complaint is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and ALMON, EMBRY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bahakel v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama
Aug 31, 1984
457 So. 2d 348 (Ala. 1984)

In Bahakel v. City of Birmingham, 457 So.2d 348 (Ala. 1984), we stated: "Rule 15 does not allow a party to amend his or her original complaint after an unsuccessful appeal, unless the mandate of the appellate court expressly permits such amendment."

Summary of this case from Ex Parte Ins. Co. of North America
Case details for

Bahakel v. City of Birmingham

Case Details

Full title:Sahid BAHAKEL v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Aug 31, 1984

Citations

457 So. 2d 348 (Ala. 1984)

Citing Cases

Karagan v. Bryant

The motion was dismissed by the trial court, and Karagan now seeks review of the court's order disallowing…

Ex Parte M.C. Dixon v. Envision

ica, 523 So.2d 1064 (Ala. 1988). It is also well settled that a party may not, on remand, amend its pleadings…