From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 22, 2010
405 F. App'x 736 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-2217.

Submitted: December 9, 2010.

Decided: December 22, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08-cv-03429-RWT).

Mary E. Goulet, Whitham, Curtis, Christofferson Cook, P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellants. Amy S. Owen, Elizabeth S. Finberg, Cochran Owen, L.L.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Michelle Johnson Bah and Mountaga Bah appeal from the district court's order dismissing their civil action, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), in which they sought to prevent foreclosure proceedings against their home. We have reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, No. 8:08-cv-03429-RWT (D.Md. Sept. 23, 2009). We deny the Appellee's motion to strike and for sanctions, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 22, 2010
405 F. App'x 736 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

Case Details

Full title:Michelle Johnson BAH; Mountaga Bah, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 22, 2010

Citations

405 F. App'x 736 (4th Cir. 2010)