From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bagwell v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 27, 2009
No. 09-09-00283-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-09-00283-CV

Opinion Delivered August 27, 2009.

On Appeal from the 356th District Court Hardin County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 48,488.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and KREGER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On July 21, 2009, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal. Appellant did not respond to the notice and the filing fee has not been paid. K. Eric Bagwell has not filed an affidavit of indigence and has not asserted that he cannot afford to pay the filing fee. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Bagwell v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 27, 2009
No. 09-09-00283-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2009)
Case details for

Bagwell v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:K. ERIC BAGWELL, Appellant v. SUSAN SMITH, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Aug 27, 2009

Citations

No. 09-09-00283-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2009)

Citing Cases

Winn Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer

But there is a marked difference between the consequences of a tort committed with and without malice;…

Lampert v. Reynolds Metals Company

Nothing is said in the Cambas opinion about a weighing of values as between plaintiff and defendant. The…