From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bagnall v. Bagnall

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 18, 1993
616 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-618.

April 13, 1993. Rehearing Denied May 18, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit court, Dade County, Bernard S. Shapiro, J.

Eduardo I. Rasco, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Marc L. Barbakoff, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.


In this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, Mr. Bagnall contends that the trial court improperly imputed unemployment compensation income to him from unemployment benefits for which he is not eligible. The written order is ambiguous as to the source of the imputed income. If the husband is not entitled to unemployment benefits, imputing such benefits would be erroneous. The final order is reversed and remanded for a clarification as to the source of the imputed income.

The relevant language of the final judgment provides:
G. That the husband's current income is limited to that of Sunrise Unlimited ($50,000 + gross annually) which can immediately be supplemented by unemployment compensation benefits of approximately $200 per week for the next six to nine months.
H. That the court will impute additional income to the husband of $24,000 annually in anticipation of his obtaining full time employment as an accountant/controller (allowing for a 50% reduction from his Mertens salary) with said imputed salary replacing the unemployment compensation benefits.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Bagnall v. Bagnall

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 18, 1993
616 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Bagnall v. Bagnall

Case Details

Full title:GERALD BAGNALL, APPELLANT, v. STELLA BAGNALL, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 18, 1993

Citations

616 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)