From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bagarozy v. Stoneman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 1957
4 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

October 29, 1957


Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. In reaching its determination, the learned court at Special Term invoked the doctrine of the "law of the case" with respect to the first and second causes of action. That doctrine need not be applied in this court. We conclude that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Bagarozy v. Stoneman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 1957
4 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

Bagarozy v. Stoneman

Case Details

Full title:E. RICHARD BAGAROZY, Appellant, v. FRED F. STONEMAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

Weicker v. Weicker

The prior disposition of the motion to strike prejudicial matter (CPLR 3024, subd. [b]) is not the law of the…