From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baez v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2553 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2553 EFB P

10-03-2011

ANTHONY BAEZ, Petitioner, v. G. SWARTHOUT, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a prisoner without counsel, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

A petitioner seeking a writ of habeas corpus either must pay the $5.00 filing fee, see 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), or request leave of court to proceed in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

Petitioner has neither paid the fee nor submitted an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Within 30 days from the day this order is served, petitioner may submit either the filing fee or the application required by section 1915(a). Petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to petitioner a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

So ordered.

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Baez v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2553 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Baez v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BAEZ, Petitioner, v. G. SWARTHOUT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 3, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2553 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)